Skip to main content

Distinction between "Reservations" and "Land Held in Trust"

EO Guidance Document #
FNS-GD-2005-0008
FNS Document #
FD-043
Resource type
Policy Memos
Guidance Documents
Resource Materials
PDF Icon Policy Memo (64.22 KB)
DATE: February 23, 2005
MEMO CODE: FD-043: Food Distribution Program on Indian Reservations (FDPIR)
SUBJECT: Distinction between “Reservations” and “Land Held in Trust”

This memorandum provides guidance on the distinction between “reservations” and “land held in trust” or “trust land.” Under 7 CFR 253.2, a “reservation” must meet two criteria:

  1. it must be a geographically defined area (or areas) over which an Indian Tribal Organization (ITO) exercises governmental jurisdiction; and
  2. it must be an area (or areas) that is legally recognized by the federal or a state government as being set aside for the use of Indians. In accordance with 25 USC 2201, “trust lands” are those lands where the title is held in trust by the United States for the benefit of American Indian tribes or for the benefit of individual American Indians.

In accordance with 25 USC 2201, “trust lands” are those lands where the title is held in trust by the United States for the benefit of American Indian tribes or for the benefit of individual American Indians.

The Supreme Court affirmed that trust land qualifies as a reservation if it has been validly set apart for the use of Tribes. Therefore, land held in trust for the benefit of a federally recognized Tribe would meet the definition of “reservation” for FDPIR purposes. However, land held in trust for individual American Indians does not qualify as a reservation.

Cathie McCullough
Director
Food Distribution Division

Page updated: February 01, 2023

The contents of this guidance document do not have the force and effect of law and are not meant to bind the public in any way. This document is intended only to provide clarity to the public regarding existing requirements under the law or agency policies.